A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
Blog Article
This can be supposed to be the "go to" powder-or darn near to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It is actually the foundation for numerous pet loads, nonetheless I have never been happy with the final results.
Obviously, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different good deal figures, but I feel I understand why. It's a litigation-driven entire world, and many fool would absolutely deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and come up with his possess custom combination of powder. What a world.
What's the difference? Compression. Without the Intense/large compression linked to the prolonged grain 7828, the force curve was altered and also the load fell apart.
Sweet!! I am going to select some up and provides it a try out. Thanks guys, I take pleasure in it! I'll let you know very well what I learn. I do have a few half pound of 4350 I'm able to check out that very first and see what takes place.
In any case, I knew The 2 pounds of H4831SC utilised the same data, but I did not know no matter if there was anything distinct involving a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and one not so labeled. A connect with to Hodgdon confirmed which they were the truth is equivalent and the sole variance was the logo over the label.
It's possible that no even more discussion is required, during which scenario h4831sc load data we advocate starting up a completely new thread. If nevertheless you really feel your response is necessary you can nonetheless do so.
If there's no load data it can be simply because this powder is just not well suited for this cartridge. h4831 vs h4831sc Usually a single will not likely find 1 powder to fit all cartridges, as well as family members of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) you are asking about isn't going to do the job.
Like explained above, similar stuff. All of that differs is the size on the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Down the road. I don't know if that's genuine or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC for the reason that which is what I found in the eight lb jug and it really works.
Together with the smoother movement properties arrives more uniform cost weights, whilst the person grains orient much more compactly, developing far better loading density.
locutus reported: I however have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by my powder actions smoothly.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly different powders, with IMR 4831 becoming substantially more quickly as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Really don't address them as a similar powder, since they most certainly are not.
The "SC" stands for Small Lower. I haven't observed a distinction between possibly powder dut I don't Assume I would h4831sc combine them.
I'm sure the H4831SC provides an even better load density But I think I have more than enough space in my scenario for the traditional H4831.
The reality that the H4831 is certainly a slower burning powder is specifically why you are seeing larger velocities received with that powder, in contrast to Anything you've seen With all the IMR stuff.